Green myth of ecological town

2019-04-13 News No comment

Originally launched in 2007, Eco Towns is a zero-carbon, energy-efficient settlement designed to reduce emissions and achieve sustainable lifestyles. However, this is theoretically effective, allowing development to provide a large amount of green land.

It is sometimes more sensible to focus development on urban settlements in existing infrastructure. This would be a cheaper alternative to avoid the possibility of an unfavorable Truman effect. At the same time, try to reduce the green space consumed.

There are many benefits to focusing our development on existing settlements, especially because:

Most of our towns and cities have been around for a long time, such as Durham, as they have evolved to provide efficient and practical places to live. Luxury for the new settlements.

The new eco-city development is highly dependent on the skills of the planning consultants involved, so it may be prone to problems often encountered during the rapid construction phase of the 1970s, and many residential towers are still in disrepair and/or destroyed to this day.

Since a large number of infrastructure and facilities have been established, including schools, hospitals, railway networks and tram systems, the initial reduction in CO2 emissions can be achieved by reducing the required building load and focusing on existing towns/cities. . Lower building requirements will also achieve further environmental benefits by avoiding and reducing the use of concrete, which is the main source of carbon dioxide emissions.

Due to a tighter mix of services, etc., if the planning and implementation are carried out in the right way, the increase in density in urban areas will reduce our long-term carbon footprint to some extent; an example of this is New York, which work together to produce low carbon dioxide. Emissions.

We should encourage the transfer of our development priorities to the Brownfield area through government initiatives and financial incentives for business organizations. This will strive to maximize the efficiency of the current urban landscape.

If these locations are not available, try to determine the right location, which may require higher density [for example, those in downtown locations can achieve higher yields, making the construction of skyscrapers and multi-storey floors commercially viable ]. Only after these channels have been fully explored should we consider building in the Greenfield area, and in this case, this should be a model of urban sprawl, continuing the traditional expansion of the following major transportation routes and familiar band development patterns.

Therefore, as highlighted in this paper, there are great reasons to focus on the planned new eco-towns, which, although theoretically feasible, require significant resources to implement and have adverse environmental side effects.

It is likely that if there is no improper pressure from housing developers and politicians' attempts to show forward-thinking, the case of eco-towns will be revoked long ago, but as the debate erupts, they are more likely to be included. .

Natural Insomnia Program - Blue Heron Health News (view mobile),Click here! Breaking News: New Copy Crushes It! -- Article-style (view mobile),Click here!

leave me a message

Copyright@WaiWaitech inc. © Technology All rights reserved.  

User login ⁄ Register